↓ Skip to main content

Molecular systematics of vestimentiferan tubeworms from hydrothermal vents and cold-water seeps

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, December 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Molecular systematics of vestimentiferan tubeworms from hydrothermal vents and cold-water seeps
Published in
Marine Biology, December 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002270050233
Authors

M. B. Black, K. M. Halanych, P. A. Y. Maas, W. R. Hoeh, J. Hashimoto, D. Desbruyères, R. A. Lutz, R. C. Vrijenhoek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
Portugal 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 58%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 8%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,340
of 3,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,619
of 94,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.