↓ Skip to main content

RNA regulation of epigenetic processes

Overview of attention for article published in BioEssays, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA regulation of epigenetic processes
Published in
BioEssays, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/bies.080099
Pubmed ID
Authors

John S. Mattick, Paulo P. Amaral, Marcel E. Dinger, Tim R. Mercer, Mark F. Mehler

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that dynamic changes to chromatin, chromosomes and nuclear architecture are regulated by RNA signalling. Although the precise molecular mechanisms are not well understood, they appear to involve the differential recruitment of a hierarchy of generic chromatin modifying complexes and DNA methyltransferases to specific loci by RNAs during differentiation and development. A significant fraction of the genome-wide transcription of non-protein coding RNAs may be involved in this process, comprising a previously hidden layer of intermediary genetic information that underpins developmental ontogeny and the differences between species, ecotypes and individuals. It is also evident that RNA editing is a primary means by which hardwired genetic information in animals can be altered by environmental signals, especially in the brain, indicating a dynamic RNA-mediated interplay between the transcriptome, the environment and the epigenome. Moreover, RNA-directed regulatory processes may also transfer epigenetic information not only within cells but also between cells and organ systems, as well as across generations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 393 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 112 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 20%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Professor 31 7%
Other 84 20%
Unknown 38 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 250 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Neuroscience 6 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 <1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 47 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioEssays
#1,340
of 3,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,530
of 184,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEssays
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.