↓ Skip to main content

Hepatic injury, liver monitoring and the beta-interferons for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Hepatic injury, liver monitoring and the beta-interferons for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00415-004-0619-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Tremlett, Joel Oger

Abstract

This review explores the salient issues surrounding liver injury and liver monitoring associated with beta-interferon (IFNB) treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Post-marketing studies have found a higher proportion of IFNB-treated MS patients with elevated aminotransferases than reported in the pivotal clinical trials. Although the risk of severe liver injury appears small, the true incidence is unknown. Post-marketing studies have shown that the greatest period of risk for the development of liver test abnormalities appears to be in the first year of IFNB treatment. The risk also increases with the more frequently administered, higher-dosage IFNBs. Males are more likely than females to develop elevated aminotransferases (> upper normal limit), although females appear at a greater risk of severe liver injury. Of the commonly used biochemical liver tests, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and bilirubin appear the most useful for routine monitoring of IFNB treatment. Whilst many other factors can affect liver test results, including obesity, alcohol, concomitant medications, co-morbidities and theoretically even MS itself, regular liver testing both prior and during IFNB therapy might help minimise Type A or dose/frequency dependent aminotransferase elevations. However, testing will probably not prevent the Type B idiosyncratic reactions which can result in severe hepatic injury; hence patients need to be aware, and to report hepatic side effects promptly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,412,603
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#178
of 4,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,847
of 62,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.