↓ Skip to main content

“Lorenzo’s Oil” Therapy for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy: Rationale and Current Assessment of Efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
“Lorenzo’s Oil” Therapy for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy: Rationale and Current Assessment of Efficacy
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12031-007-0041-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo W. Moser, Ann B. Moser, Kim Hollandsworth, N. Hong Brereton, Gerald V. Raymond

Abstract

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) is a genetic disorder that damages the nervous system and is associated with the accumulation of saturated very long chain fatty acids (SVLCFA). Oral administration of "Lorenzo's oil" (LO), a 4:1 mixture of glyceryl trioleate and glyceryl trierucate, normalizes the SVLCFA levels in plasma, but its clinical efficacy and the clinical indications for its use have been controversial for more than 15 years. We review the biochemical effects of LO administration and the rationale for its use and present a current appraisal of its capacity to reduce the risk for the childhood cerebral phenotype when administered to asymptomatic boys and to slow progression of adrenomyeloneuropathy in patients without cerebral involvement. We also present current efforts to provide definitive evaluation of its clinical efficacy and discuss its possible role in the new therapeutic opportunities that will arise if newborn screening for X-ALD is validated and implemented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 24%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#485
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,485
of 79,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.