↓ Skip to main content

10.慢性疲労症候群患者におけるGTPシクロヒドロラーゼI遺伝子多型の解析(第425回研究協議会研究発表要旨,ビタミンB研究委員会)

Overview of attention for article published in VITAMINS, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 118)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
10.慢性疲労症候群患者におけるGTPシクロヒドロラーゼI遺伝子多型の解析(第425回研究協議会研究発表要旨,ビタミンB研究委員会)
Published in
VITAMINS, November 2011
DOI 10.20632/vso.85.11_616
Authors

堀口 美恵子, 福田 早苗, 一瀬 宏, 中富 康仁, 山口 浩二, 倉恒 弘彦, 渡辺 恭良

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,854,022
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from VITAMINS
#6
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,613
of 153,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VITAMINS
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them