↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of DNA modifications in aging research

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of DNA modifications in aging research
Published in
GeroScience, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11357-018-0005-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin R. Masser, Niran Hadad, Hunter Porter, Michael B. Stout, Archana Unnikrishnan, David R. Stanford, Willard M. Freeman

Abstract

As geroscience research extends into the role of epigenetics in aging and age-related disease, researchers are being confronted with unfamiliar molecular techniques and data analysis methods that can be difficult to integrate into their work. In this review, we focus on the analysis of DNA modifications, namely cytosine methylation and hydroxymethylation, through next-generation sequencing methods. While older techniques for modification analysis performed relative quantitation across regions of the genome or examined average genome levels, these analyses lack the desired specificity, rigor, and genomic coverage to firmly establish the nature of genomic methylation patterns and their response to aging. With recent methodological advances, such as whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), bisulfite oligonucleotide capture sequencing (BOCS), and bisulfite amplicon sequencing (BSAS), cytosine modifications can now be readily analyzed with base-specific, absolute quantitation at both cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CG) and non-CG sites throughout the genome or within specific regions of interest by next-generation sequencing. Additional advances, such as oxidative bisulfite conversion to differentiate methylation from hydroxymethylation and analysis of limited input/single-cells, have great promise for continuing to expand epigenomic capabilities. This review provides a background on DNA modifications, the current state-of-the-art for sequencing methods, bioinformatics tools for converting these large data sets into biological insights, and perspectives on future directions for the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,922,923
of 23,764,938 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#427
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,360
of 446,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,764,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them