↓ Skip to main content

Exclusion of the C/D box snoRNA gene cluster HBII-52 from a major role in Prader–Willi syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exclusion of the C/D box snoRNA gene cluster HBII-52 from a major role in Prader–Willi syndrome
Published in
Human Genetics, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00439-004-1219-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maren Runte, Raymonda Varon, Denise Horn, Bernhard Horsthemke, Karin Buiting

Abstract

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are distinct neurogenetic disorders caused by the loss of function of imprinted genes in 15q11-q13. The maternally expressed UBE3A gene is affected in AS. Four protein-encoding genes (MKRN3, MAGEL2, NDN and SNURF-SNRPN) and several small nucleolar (sno) RNA genes (HBII-13, HBII-436, HBII-85, HBII-438A, HBII-438B and HBII-52) are expressed from the paternal chromosome only but their contribution to PWS is unclear. To examine the role of the HBII-52 snoRNA genes, we have reinvestigated an AS family with a submicroscopic deletion spanning UBE3A and flanking sequences. By fine mapping of the centromeric deletion breakpoint in this family, we have found that the deletion affects all of the 47 HBII-52 genes. Since the complete loss of the HBII-52 genes in family members who carry the deletion on their paternal chromosome is not associated with an obvious clinical phenotype, we conclude that HBII-52 snoRNA genes do not play a major role in PWS. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the loss of HBII-52 has a phenotypic effect when accompanied by the loss of function of other genes in 15q11-q13.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,176
of 140,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.