| Title |
MR and CT imaging of 24 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXA) and a review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroradiology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00234-006-0191-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana M. Crespo-Rodríguez, James G. Smirniotopoulos, Elisabeth J. Rushing |
| Abstract |
The aim of our study was to review the imaging appearance of PXA, a rare and usually low-grade, astrocytic tumor that typically occurs in young adults. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 62% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#303
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,290
of 157,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them