↓ Skip to main content

Profiling attention and cognition enhancing drugs in a rat touchscreen-based continuous performance test

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Profiling attention and cognition enhancing drugs in a rat touchscreen-based continuous performance test
Published in
Psychopharmacology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00213-017-4827-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiyong Ding, Jordan W. Brown, Lynne E. Rueter, Eric G. Mohler

Abstract

A novel rodent continuous performance test (CPT) was developed as one of the goals of the NEWMEDS (Novel Methods leading to New Medications in Depression and Schizophrenia) consortium to improve its translatability to the CPT test used in human subjects. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of attention and cognition enhancing drugs in rodent CPT. A single cohort of rats were trained to asymptotic performance in the test. Pharmacological test sessions were then performed twice per week in a full crossover design with the following drugs tested: methylphenidate (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg), the α4β2 nicotinic agonist ABT-594 (0.0023, 0.007 and 0.023 mg/kg), modafinil (8, 16, and 32 mg/kg), atomoxetine (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg), donepezil (0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg), and memantine (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg). The stimulant-like drugs methylphenidate, ABT-594, and modafinil were found to increase measures of impulsivity and overall responding with generally no positive effects on d', a putative measure of attention, with the exception of ABT-594 which improved d' at the highest dose tested. Atomoxetine and the memory-enhancing drugs donepezil and memantine, on the other hand, were found to reduce measures of impulsivity and responding and had either negligible or worsening effects on d'. Our results suggest rodent CPT can detect changes in impulsivity resulting from drugs known to improve attention in rodents and humans. However, additional work is needed to assess the sensitivity and validity of this assay for assessing effects on attention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 25%
Neuroscience 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%