↓ Skip to main content

Intra-operative Video Characterization of Carotid Artery Pulsation Patterns in Case Series with Post-endarterectomy Hypertension and Hyperperfusion Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Stroke Research, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Intra-operative Video Characterization of Carotid Artery Pulsation Patterns in Case Series with Post-endarterectomy Hypertension and Hyperperfusion Syndrome
Published in
Translational Stroke Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12975-017-0605-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiming Xiao, Hassan Rivaz, Hidetoshi Kasuya, Suguru Yokosako, Cristina Mindru, Jeanne Teitelbaum, Denis Sirhan, David Sinclair, Mark Angle, Benjamin W. Y. Lo

Abstract

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a complication that can occur after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the treatment of choice to decrease the subsequent risk of fatal or disabling stroke for patients with symptomatic severe stenosis of the carotid artery. Because of its rarity and complexity, the mechanism of the condition is still unclear, making its prevention via prediction and monitoring challenging. This is especially true during surgery, when multiple factors can induce physiological changes, including blood pressure and baroreceptor functions, which are crucial factors for post-CEA hypertension and CHS. Thus, with intra-operative videos taken by surgical microscopes, we employed a new video processing technique to magnify ordinarily invisible carotid artery pulsation patterns as rhythmic color fluctuations. We applied the technique for three CEA cases, two of which developed CHS with post-CEA hypertension. For those with CHS, abnormal pulsation patterns were detected at the site of the baroreceptors. The results suggested that intra-operative baroreceptor dysfunction can potentially be linked with post-operative hypertension, as well as the occurrence of CHS. Guided by the preliminary discovery, further investigation may help establish the introduced technique as a simple and contactless technique to help predict post-CEA hypertension and CHS in order to facilitate the management and understanding of the condition and improve the care of CEA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Neuroscience 3 15%
Psychology 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Translational Stroke Research
#230
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,771
of 443,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Stroke Research
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.