↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine functions as an antiherbivore defense in the temperate green alga Ulvaria obscura

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Dopamine functions as an antiherbivore defense in the temperate green alga Ulvaria obscura
Published in
Oecologia, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00442-006-0378-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn L. Van Alstyne, Amorah V. Nelson, James R. Vyvyan, Devon A. Cancilla

Abstract

On northeastern Pacific coasts, Ulvaria obscura is a dominant component of subtidal "green tide" blooms, which can be harmful to marine communities, fisheries, and aquaculture facilities. U. obscura is avoided by herbivores relative to many other locally common macrophytes, which may contribute to its ability to form persistent blooms. We used a bioassay-guided fractionation method to experimentally determine the cause of reduced feeding on Ulvaria by echinoderms, molluscs, and arthropods. Our results indicated that dopamine, which constituted an average of 4.4% of the alga's dry mass, was responsible for decreased feeding by sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis). Subsequent experiments demonstrated that dopamine also reduced the feeding rates of snails (Littorina sitkana) and isopods (Idotea wosnesenskii). Dopamine is a catecholamine that is a common neurotransmitter in animals. The catecholamines dopamine, epinephrine (adrenaline), and norepinephrine also occur in at least 44 families of higher plants. The functions of catecholamines in plants are less well known than in animals but are likely to be diverse and include both physiological and ecological roles. Our results are the first experimental demonstration of a plant or algal catecholamine functioning as a feeding deterrent. This novel use of dopamine by Ulvaria may contribute to the formation and persistence of harmful Ulvaria blooms in northeastern Pacific coastal waters.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Mexico 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 49%
Environmental Science 13 14%
Chemistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,835,254
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,714
of 4,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,032
of 71,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.