↓ Skip to main content

The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: classification and clinical features of relapsing and progressive neurological syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: classification and clinical features of relapsing and progressive neurological syndromes
Published in
Neurological Sciences, November 2001
DOI 10.1007/s100720100044
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Trojano, D. Paolicelli

Abstract

In the absence of pathognomonic clinical features or a definitive laboratory test, multiple sclerosis (MS) remains ultimately a diagnosis of exclusion. Accurate diagnosis is increasingly important with available disease modifying therapy. Unfortunately the rate of misdiagnosis remains around 5%-10%, indicating that 1 in 20 patients thought to have MS has, instead, a condition resembling MS. In this review we describe conditions that may be confused with MS because they can present as lesions disseminated in time, space, or both. Conditions often confused with MS may be inflammatory (systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, Behçet's disease), infectious (Lyme disease, syphilis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, HTLV-1 infection, herpes zoster), genetic (lysosomal disorders, adrenoleukodystrophy, mitochondrial disorders, CADASIL), metabolic (vitamin B12 deficiency), neoplastic (CNS lymphoma) and spinal (degenerative and vascular malformations) diseases. The key to the accurate diagnosis of MS is vigilance for atypical features, suggesting the possibility of an alternative diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor 8 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 19 18%