↓ Skip to main content

Variation in Cilia Protein Genes and Progression of Lung Disease in Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in Cilia Protein Genes and Progression of Lung Disease in Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, January 2018
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201706-451oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Blue, Tin L Louie, Jessica X Chong, Scott J Hebbring, Kathleen C Barnes, Nicholas M Rafaels, Michael R Knowles, Ronald L Gibson, Michael J Bamshad, Mary J Emond

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis, like primary ciliary dyskinesia, is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by abnormal mucociliary clearance and obstructive lung disease. We hypothesized that genes underlying the development or function of cilia may modify lung disease severity in persons with cystic fibrosis. To test this hypothesis, we compared variants in 93 candidate genes in both upper and lower tertiles of lung function in a large cohort of children and adults with cystic fibrosis to a population control data set. Variants within candidate genes were tested for association using the SKAT-O test, comparing cystic fibrosis cases defined by poor (n=127) or preserved (n=127) lung function to population controls (n= 3269 or 3148, respectively). Associated variants were then tested for association with related phenotypes in independent data sets. Variants in DNAH14 and DNAAF3 were associated with poor lung function in cystic fibrosis, while variants in DNAH14 and DNAH6 were associated with preserved lung function in cystic fibrosis. Association between DNAH14 and lung function were replicated in disease-related phenotypes characterized by obstructive lung disease in adults. Genetic variants within DNAH6, DNAH14, and DNAAF3 are associated with variation in lung function among person with cystic fibrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#2,872
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,954
of 450,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#72
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.