↓ Skip to main content

Proof of the positive mass theorem. II

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Proof of the positive mass theorem. II
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf01942062
Authors

Richard Schoen, Shing-Tung Yau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 20 59%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,746,777
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#370
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,751
of 7,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them