↓ Skip to main content

A multiple imputation method based on weighted quantile regression models for longitudinal censored biomarker data with missing values at early visits

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multiple imputation method based on weighted quantile regression models for longitudinal censored biomarker data with missing values at early visits
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-017-0463-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

MinJae Lee, Mohammad H. Rahbar, Matthew Brown, Lianne Gensler, Michael Weisman, Laura Diekman, John D. Reveille

Abstract

In patient-based studies, biomarker data are often subject to left censoring due to the detection limits, or to incomplete sample or data collection. In the context of longitudinal regression analysis, inappropriate handling of these issues could lead to biased parameter estimates. We developed a specific multiple imputation (MI) strategy based on weighted censored quantile regression (CQR) that not only accounts for censoring, but also missing data at early visits when longitudinal biomarker data are modeled as a covariate. We assessed through simulation studies the performances of developed imputation approach by considering various scenarios of covariance structures of longitudinal data and levels of censoring. We also illustrated the application of the proposed method to the Prospective Study of Outcomes in Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (PSOAS) data to address the issues of censored or missing C-reactive protein (CRP) level at early visits for a group of patients. Our findings from simulation studies indicated that the proposed method performs better than other MI methods by having a higher relative efficiency. We also found that our approach is not sensitive to the choice of covariance structure as compared to other methods that assume normality of biomarker data. The analysis results of PSOAS data from the imputed CRP levels based on our method suggested that higher CRP is significantly associated with radiographic damage, while those from other methods did not result in a significant association. The MI based on weighted CQR offers a more valid statistical approach to evaluate a biomarker of disease in the presence of both issues with censoring and missing data in early visits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Mathematics 4 11%
Computer Science 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,964,325
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,456
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,719
of 443,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.