↓ Skip to main content

Mushrooms and Economic Botany1

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Mushrooms and Economic Botany1
Published in
Economic Botany, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12231-008-9046-3
Authors

David Arora, Glenn H. Shepard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
Chile 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Algeria 1 2%
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 58 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 45%
Environmental Science 11 17%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,391,439
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#801
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,340
of 91,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.