Title |
Web-based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11764-014-0400-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise Moody, Andrew Turner, Jane Osmond, Louise Hooker, Joanna Kosmala-Anderson, Lynn Batehup |
Abstract |
As the population of young cancer survivors increases, there is a need to develop alternative ways of providing post-treatment support. Online systems potentially offer self-management and e-learning support following cancer treatment. This research aims to explore the self-management support needs of teenage and young adult cancer survivors and consider whether those needs can be met through a web-based self-management resource. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 83% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 20% |
Psychology | 20 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,702,787
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#477
of 968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,142
of 250,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.