↓ Skip to main content

Divergent evolution of newborn screening: Israel and the US as gene worlds

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Divergent evolution of newborn screening: Israel and the US as gene worlds
Published in
BioSocieties, January 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41292-017-0110-z
Authors

Aviad E. Raz, Stefan Timmermans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 32%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,490,884
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#135
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,798
of 442,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.