↓ Skip to main content

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Therapeutics: Where do we Stand?

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
10 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Spinal Muscular Atrophy Therapeutics: Where do we Stand?
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13311-015-0337-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constantin d’Ydewalle, Charlotte J. Sumner

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder pathologically characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord and muscle atrophy. Motor neuron loss often results in severe muscle weakness causing affected infants to die before reaching 2 years of age. Patients with milder forms of SMA exhibit slowly progressive muscle weakness over many years. SMA is caused by the loss of SMN1 and the retention of at least 1 copy of a highly homologous SMN2. An alternative splicing event in the pre-mRNA arising from SMN2 results in the production of low levels of functional SMN protein. To date, there are no effective treatments available to treat patients with SMA. However, over the last 2 decades, the development of SMA mouse models and the identification of therapeutic targets have resulted in a promising drug pipeline for SMA. Here, we highlight some of the therapeutic strategies that have been developed to activate SMN2 expression, modulate splicing of the SMN2 pre-mRNA, or replace SMN1 by gene therapy. After 2 decades of translational research, we now stand within reach of a treatment for SMA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,983
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#245
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,388
of 361,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.