↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Relationships Among Barley and Arabidopsis Core Circadian Clock and Clock-Associated Genes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evolutionary Relationships Among Barley and Arabidopsis Core Circadian Clock and Clock-Associated Genes
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00239-015-9665-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiane P. G. Calixto, Robbie Waugh, John W. S. Brown

Abstract

The circadian clock regulates a multitude of plant developmental and metabolic processes. In crop species, it contributes significantly to plant performance and productivity and to the adaptation and geographical range over which crops can be grown. To understand the clock in barley and how it relates to the components in the Arabidopsis thaliana clock, we have performed a systematic analysis of core circadian clock and clock-associated genes in barley, Arabidopsis and another eight species including tomato, potato, a range of monocotyledonous species and the moss, Physcomitrella patens. We have identified orthologues and paralogues of Arabidopsis genes which are conserved in all species, monocot/dicot differences, species-specific differences and variation in gene copy number (e.g. gene duplications among the various species). We propose that the common ancestor of barley and Arabidopsis had two-thirds of the key clock components identified in Arabidopsis prior to the separation of the monocot/dicot groups. After this separation, multiple independent gene duplication events took place in both monocot and dicot ancestors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Engineering 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,289,913
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,146
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,660
of 361,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.