↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Plasmid Design and Type of Integration Event on Recombinant Protein Expression in Pichia pastoris

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Plasmid Design and Type of Integration Event on Recombinant Protein Expression in Pichia pastoris
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1128/aem.02712-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Vogl, Leigh Gebbie, Robin W. Palfreyman, Robert Speight

Abstract

Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella phaffii) is one of the most common eukaryotic expression systems for heterologous protein production. Expression cassettes are typically integrated in the genome to obtain stable expression strains. In contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where short overhangs are sufficient to target highly specific integration, long overhangs are more efficient in P. pastoris and ectopic integration of foreign DNA can occur. Here, we aimed to elucidate the influence of ectopic integration by high throughput screening of >700 transformants and whole genome sequencing of 27 transformants. Different vector designs and linearization approaches were used to mimic the most common integration events targeted in P. pastoris Fluorescence of an eGFP reporter protein was highly uniform amongst transformants when the expression cassettes were correctly integrated in the targeted locus. Surprisingly, most non-specifically integrated transformants showed highly uniform expression that was comparable to specific integration, suggesting that non-specific integration does not necessarily influence expression. However, a few clones (<10%) harboring ectopically integrated cassettes showed a greater variation spanning a 25-fold range, surpassing specifically integrated reference strains up to 6-fold. High expression strains showed a correlation between increased gene copy numbers and high reporter protein fluorescence levels. Our results suggest that for comparing expression levels between strains, the integration locus can be neglected as long as a sufficient numbers of transformed strains are compared. For expression optimization of highly expressible proteins, increasing copy number appears to be the dominant positive influence rather than the integration locus, genomic rearrangements, deletions or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).ImportanceYeasts are commonly used as biotechnological production hosts for proteins and metabolites. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression cassettes carrying foreign genes integrate highly specifically at the targeted sites in the genome. In contrast, cassettes often integrate at random genomic positions in non-conventional yeasts such as Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella phaffii). Hence cells from the same transformation event often behave differently with significant clonal variation necessitating the screening of large numbers of strains. The importance of this study is that we systematically investigated the influence of integration events in over 700 strains. Our findings provide novel insight into clonal variation in P. pastoris, and thus how to avoid pitfalls and obtain reliable results. The underlying mechanisms may also play a role in other yeasts and hence could be generally relevant for recombinant yeast protein production strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 269 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Student > Master 42 16%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 81 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 13%
Engineering 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Chemical Engineering 4 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 93 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#18,457
of 19,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,283
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#154
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.