↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Recent Smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 Interventions to Address the HIV Continuum of Care

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
481 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of Recent Smartphone, Internet and Web 2.0 Interventions to Address the HIV Continuum of Care
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11904-014-0239-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn E. Muessig, Manali Nekkanti, Jose Bauermeister, Sheana Bull, Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman

Abstract

eHealth, mHealth and "Web 2.0" social media strategies can effectively reach and engage key populations in HIV prevention across the testing, treatment, and care continuum. To assess how these tools are currently being used within the field of HIV prevention and care, we systematically reviewed recent (2013-2014) published literature, conference abstracts, and funded research. Our searches identified 23 published intervention studies and 32 funded projects underway. In this synthesis we describe the technology modes applied and the stages of the HIV care cascade addressed, including both primary and secondary prevention activities. Overall trends include use of new tools including social networking sites, provision of real-time assessment and feedback, gamification and virtual reality. While there has been increasing attention to use of technology to address the care continuum, gaps remain around linkage to care, retention in care, and initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 467 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 15%
Student > Master 72 15%
Researcher 62 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 7%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Other 100 21%
Unknown 111 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 19%
Social Sciences 65 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 12%
Psychology 37 8%
Computer Science 28 6%
Other 74 15%
Unknown 128 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,903,691
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#55
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,148
of 356,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.