| Title |
Morphokinetic parameters of early embryo development via time lapse monitoring and their effect on embryo selection and ICSI outcomes: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-015-0436-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charalampos Siristatidis, Maria Aggeliki Komitopoulou, Andreas Makris, Afrodite Sialakouma, Mitrodora Botzaki, George Mastorakos, George Salamalekis, Stefano Bettocchi, Giles Anthony Palmer |
| Abstract |
To compare the outcomes of embryos selected via time lapse monitoring (TLM) versus those selected with conventional methods of selection in subfertile women undergoing ICSI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,190,918
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#846
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,415
of 359,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.