↓ Skip to main content

Individual Characteristics and the Multiple Contexts of Adolescent Bullying: An Ecological Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
Title
Individual Characteristics and the Multiple Contexts of Adolescent Bullying: An Ecological Perspective
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10964-008-9271-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gia Elise Barboza, Lawrence B. Schiamberg, James Oehmke, Steven J. Korzeniewski, Lori A. Post, Cedrick G. Heraux

Abstract

This paper uses an ecological perspective to explore the risk factors associated with bullying behaviors among a representative sample of adolescents aged 11-14 (n = 9816; X = 12.88; s = .9814). Data derived from the Health Behavior in School Children: WHO Cross-National Survey were used to model the relationship between bullying and media effects, peer and family support systems, self-efficacy, and school environment. Overall, the results of this study suggest that bullying increases among children who watch television frequently, lack teacher support, have themselves been bullied, attend schools with unfavorable environments, have emotional support from their peers, and have teachers and parents who do not place high expectations on their school performance. In addition, we found an inverse relationship between being Asian or African American, feeling left out of school activities and bullying. Our results lend support to the contention that bullying arises out of deficits in social climate, but that social support systems mediate bullying behavior irrespective of the student's racial/ethnic characteristics, parental income levels or media influences. Because the number of friends and the ability to talk to these friends increases the likelihood of bullying, we suggest that bullying is not simply an individual response to a particular environment but is a peer-group behavior. We conclude that limiting television viewing hours, improving student's abilities to access family support systems and improving school atmospheres are potentially useful interventions to limit bullying behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 336 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Student > Master 62 18%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 70 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 115 33%
Social Sciences 82 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Arts and Humanities 8 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 83 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#418
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,349
of 83,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.