↓ Skip to main content

On geometric classification of 5d SCFTs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
On geometric classification of 5d SCFTs
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep04(2018)103
Authors

Patrick Jefferson, Sheldon Katz, Hee-Cheol Kim, Cumrun Vafa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 43%
Researcher 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 17 81%
Mathematics 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#4,748
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,892
of 340,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#104
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.