You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
歯科治療に関連した重篤なショック, 心肺停止報告200例の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Reanimatology, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.11414/jjreanimatology1983.24.82 |
| Authors |
伊藤 寛, 小川 幸恵, 清野 浩昭, 川合 宏仁, 山崎 信也, 奥秋 晟 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Reanimatology
#4
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,149
of 67,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Reanimatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them