| Title |
On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, July 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00339948 |
| Authors |
Martin Egelhaaf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 31% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 29% |
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,680
of 9,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.