↓ Skip to main content

The cytomorphic system of anucleate non-mammalian erythrocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, February 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The cytomorphic system of anucleate non-mammalian erythrocytes
Published in
Protoplasma, February 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf01283036
Authors

W. D. Cohen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
France 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#133
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,298
of 30,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them