↓ Skip to main content

Colymbus, Hesperornis, Podiceps: ein Vergleich ihrer hinteren Extremität

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, January 1935
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Colymbus, Hesperornis, Podiceps: ein Vergleich ihrer hinteren Extremität
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, January 1935
DOI 10.1007/bf01908745
Authors

Max Stolpe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#774
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 2,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them