↓ Skip to main content

Hibernation in the tropics: lessons from a primate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Hibernation in the tropics: lessons from a primate
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00360-004-0470-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin H. Dausmann, Julian Glos, Jörg U. Ganzhorn, Gerhard Heldmaier

Abstract

The Malagasy primate Cheirogaleus medius hibernates in tree holes for 7 months, although ambient temperatures during hibernation rise above 30 degrees C in their natural environment. In a field study we show that during hibernation the body temperature of most lemurs fluctuates between about 10 degrees C and 30 degrees C, closely tracking the diurnal fluctuations of ambient temperature passively. These lemurs do not interrupt hibernation by spontaneous arousals, previously thought to be obligatory for all mammalian hibernators. However, some lemurs hibernate in large trees, which provide better thermal insulation. Their body temperature fluctuates only little around 25 degrees C, but they show regular arousals, as known from temperate and arctic hibernators. The results from this study demonstrate that maximum body temperature is a key factor necessitating the occurrence of arousals. Furthermore, we show that hibernation is not necessarily coupled to low body temperature and, therefore, low body temperature should no longer be included in the definition of hibernation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 134 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 59%
Environmental Science 18 12%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,007,660
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#189
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,654
of 148,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them