↓ Skip to main content

Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions

Overview of attention for article published in Decisions in Economics and Finance, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions
Published in
Decisions in Economics and Finance, May 2000
DOI 10.1007/s102030050005
Authors

Robert Bordley, Marco LiCalzi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Virgin Islands, U.S. 1 2%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 12 19%
Psychology 9 14%
Computer Science 8 13%
Engineering 8 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Other 17 27%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Decisions in Economics and Finance
#7
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,171
of 40,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Decisions in Economics and Finance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them