↓ Skip to main content

Enumerations of Lattice Animals and Trees

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Enumerations of Lattice Animals and Trees
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, February 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1004855020556
Authors

Iwan Jensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Russia 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 38%
Mathematics 4 31%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#230
of 2,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,134
of 113,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,061 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them