↓ Skip to main content

Report on Lunar Nomenclature by the Working Group of Commission 17 of The IAU

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, June 1971
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3429 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Report on Lunar Nomenclature by the Working Group of Commission 17 of The IAU
Published in
Space Science Reviews, June 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf00171763
Authors

D. H. Menzel, M. Minnaert, B. Levin, A. Dollfus, B. Bell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,730,207
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#483
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#642
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them