↓ Skip to main content

A New Porous MOF with Two Uncommon Metal–Carboxylate–Pyrazolate Clusters and High CO2/N2 Selectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Porous MOF with Two Uncommon Metal–Carboxylate–Pyrazolate Clusters and High CO2/N2 Selectivity
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, January 2015
DOI 10.1021/ic502733v
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hai-Hua Wang, Li-Na Jia, Lei Hou, Wen-juan Shi, Zhonghua Zhu, Yao-Yu Wang

Abstract

By a less-exploited strategy, a stable framework was constructed by using 4,4'-biphenyldicarboxylic acid (H2bpdc) and methyl-functionalized 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-4,4'-bipyrazole (H2bpz) coligands, revealing a new (6,8)-connected net based on two extremely rare trinuclear and tetranuclear metal-carboxylate-pyrazolate clusters. The framework is very porous and possesses not only high CO2 loadings but also very high CO2/N2 selectivities at 308 and 313 K because of the polar pore surface decorated by clusters, pyrazolyl units, and confined cages with methyl groups dangling. Importantly, GCMC simulation identified two favorable CO2 sorption sites located sequentially near Co3(pz)3 and Co3(CO2)2(pz) motifs of the tetranuclear cluster, and the multipoint framework-CO2 interactions were distinguished. The framework also displays remarkable stability toward water and organic solvents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 28 54%
Chemical Engineering 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Materials Science 2 4%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,188,395
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#9,851
of 21,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,601
of 353,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#65
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.