↓ Skip to main content

ADD/ADHD and impaired executive function in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
ADD/ADHD and impaired executive function in clinical practice
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11920-008-0065-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Brown

Abstract

The disorder currently known as attention-deficit disorder (ADD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is now recognized by most clinicians as a legitimate and widely prevalent disorder among children and adults. Yet there is still widespread misunderstanding as to the disorder's nature. Many clinicians mistakenly continue to think of this as a behavior disorder characterized by hyperactivity in children and excessive restlessness or impulsivity in adults. In fact, ADD/ADHD is essentially a cognitive disorder, a developmental impairment of executive functions (EFs), the self-management system of the brain. Although EFs are complex, their impairment constitutes a syndrome that can be recognized readily in clinical practice; impaired EF involves a pattern of chronic difficulties in executing a wide variety of daily tasks. Once recognized, this disorder can be effectively treated in most cases. In this article, I describe the nature of EF impairments in ADD/ADHD and how the syndrome can be recognized and effectively treated in clinical practice. (Note: The term ADHD is used in the balance of this article to refer to both inattentive and combined subtypes.).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 234 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 64 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,582,364
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#185
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,992
of 107,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.