↓ Skip to main content

Riboflavin analogs and inhibitors of riboflavin biosynthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Riboflavin analogs and inhibitors of riboflavin biosynthesis
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00253-006-0421-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Mack, Simon Grill

Abstract

Flavins are active components of many enzymes. In most cases, riboflavin (vitamin B(2)) as a coenzyme represents the catalytic part of the holoenzyme. Riboflavin is an amphiphatic molecule and allows a large variety of different interactions with the enzyme itself and also with the substrate. A great number of active riboflavin analogs can readily be synthesized by chemical methods and, thus, a large number of possible inhibitors for many different enzyme targets is conceivable. As mammalian and especially human biochemistry depends on flavins as well, the target of the inhibiting flavin analog has to be carefully selected to avoid unwanted effects. In addition to flavoproteins, enzymes, which are involved in the biosynthesis of flavins, are possible targets for anti-infectives. Only a few flavin analogs or inhibitors of flavin biosynthesis have been subjected to detailed studies to evaluate their biological activity. Nevertheless, flavin analogs certainly have the potential to serve as basic structures for the development of novel anti-infectives and it is possible that, in the future, the urgent need for new molecules to fight multiresistant microorganisms will be met.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 17%
Chemistry 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,338,695
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,260
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,865
of 83,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#19
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.