↓ Skip to main content

The Bacterial Peptide Pheromone Plantaricin A Permeabilizes Cancerous, but not Normal, Rat Pituitary Cells and Differentiates between the Outer and Inner Membrane Leaflet

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The Bacterial Peptide Pheromone Plantaricin A Permeabilizes Cancerous, but not Normal, Rat Pituitary Cells and Differentiates between the Outer and Inner Membrane Leaflet
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00232-007-9030-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sverre L. Sand, Trude M. Haug, Jon Nissen-Meyer, Olav Sand

Abstract

Plantaricin A (PlnA) is a 26-mer peptide pheromone with membrane-permeabilizing, strain-specific antibacterial activity, produced by Lactobacillus plantarum C11. We investigated the membrane-permeabilizing effects of PlnA on cultured cancerous and normal rat anterior pituitary cells using patch-clamp techniques and microfluorometry (fura-2). Cancerous cells displayed massive permeabilization within 5 s after exposure to 10-100 microM PlnA. The membrane depolarized to nearly 0 mV, and the membrane resistance decreased to a mere fraction of the initial value after less than 1 min. In outside-out membrane patches, 10 microM PlnA induced membrane currents reversing at 0 mV, which is compatible with an unspecific conductance increase. The D and L forms of the peptide had similar potency, indicating a nonchiral mechanism for the membrane-permeabilizing effect. Surprisingly, inside-out patches were insensitive to 1 mM PlnA. Primary cultures of normal rat anterior pituitary cells were also insensitive to the peptide. Thus, PlnA differentiates between plasma membranes and membrane leaflets. Microfluorometric recordings of [Ca(2+)](i) and cytosolic concentration of fluorochrome verified the rapid permeabilizing effect of PlnA on cancerous cells and the insensitivity of normal pituitary cells.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 17%
Unspecified 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#169
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,382
of 55,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.