↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury
Published in
Neurocritical Care, January 2006
DOI 10.1385/ncc:5:1:4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauralyn A. McIntyre, Dean A. Fergusson, James S. Hutchison, Giuseppe Pagliarello, John C. Marshall, Elizabeth Yetisir, Gregory M. T. Hare, Paul C. Hébert, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Abstract

To compare a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients with moderate to severe closed head injury following multiple trauma in 13 Canadian intensive care units (ICUs).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Australia 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 91 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Other 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 57%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,209,823
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#293
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 178,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.