You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinically led performance management in secondary healthcare: evaluating the attitudes of medical and non-clinical managers
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003219 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy M Trebble, Maureen Paul, Peter M Hockey, Nicola Heyworth, Rachael Humphrey, Timothy Powell, Nicholas Clarke |
Abstract |
Improving the quality and activity of clinicians' practice improves patient care. Performance-related human resource management (HRM) is an established approach to improving individual practice but with limited use among clinicians. A framework for performance-related HRM was developed from successful practice in non-healthcare organisations centred on distributive leadership and locally provided, validated and interpreted performance measurement. This study evaluated the response of medical and non-clinical managers to its implementation into a large secondary healthcare organisation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Colombia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2,154
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,900
of 360,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.