↓ Skip to main content

Function and evolution of nodulation genes in legumes

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Function and evolution of nodulation genes in legumes
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00018-011-0651-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keisuke Yokota, Makoto Hayashi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,539
of 110,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.