| Title |
Are Megabats Big?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:jomm.0000047340.25620.89 |
| Authors |
James M. Hutcheon, Theodore Garland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 11 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 72% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#289
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,953
of 151,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them