| Title |
Dinoflagellate Nuclear SSU rRNA Phylogeny Suggests Multiple Plastid Losses and Replacements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002390010210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan F. Saldarriaga, F.J.R. Taylor, Patrick J. Keeling, Thomas Cavalier-Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Professor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 102 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,937
of 38,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.