↓ Skip to main content

Hydrodynamic trail following in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Hydrodynamic trail following in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00359-010-0594-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nele Gläser, Sven Wieskotten, Christian Otter, Guido Dehnhardt, Wolf Hanke

Abstract

The mystacial vibrissae of pinnipeds constitute a sensory system for active touch and detection of hydrodynamic events. Harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) can both detect hydrodynamic stimuli caused by a small sphere vibrating in the water (hydrodynamic dipole stimuli). Hydrodynamic trail following has only been shown in harbour seals. Hydrodynamical and biomechanical studies of single vibrissae of the two species showed that the specialized undulated structure of harbour seal vibrissae, as opposed to the smooth structure of sea lion vibrissae, suppresses self-generated noise in the actively moving animal. Here we tested whether also sea lions were able to perform hydrodynamic trail following in spite of their non-specialized hair structure. Hydrodynamic trails were generated by a remote-controlled miniature submarine. Linear trails could be followed with high accuracy, comparable to the performance of harbour seals, but in contrast, increasing delay resulted in a reduced performance as compared to harbour seals. The results of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that structural differences in the vibrissal hair types of otariid compared to phocid pinnipeds lead to different sensitivity of the vibrissae during forward swimming, but still reveal a good performance even in the species with non-specialized hair type.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 40%
Engineering 10 14%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,802,571
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#99
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,501
of 101,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.