↓ Skip to main content

様々な吸音率測定方法 : 垂直入射吸音率,斜め入射吸音率,残響室法吸音率の違い(やさしい解説)

Overview of attention for article published in Acoustical Science and Technology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
様々な吸音率測定方法 : 垂直入射吸音率,斜め入射吸音率,残響室法吸音率の違い(やさしい解説)
Published in
Acoustical Science and Technology, June 2010
DOI 10.20697/jasj.66.6_270
Authors

杉江 聡

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Acoustical Science and Technology
#312
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,493
of 105,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acoustical Science and Technology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.