↓ Skip to main content

Leadership in Adolescent Health: Developing the Next Generation of Maternal Child Health Leaders Through Mentorship

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Leadership in Adolescent Health: Developing the Next Generation of Maternal Child Health Leaders Through Mentorship
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1619-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily A. Blood, Maria Trent, Catherine M. Gordon, Adrianne Goncalves, Michael Resnick, J. Dennis Fortenberry, Cherrie B. Boyer, Laura Richardson, S. Jean Emans

Abstract

Leadership development is a core value of Maternal Child Health Bureau training programs. Mentorship, an MCH Leadership Competency, has been shown to positively affect career advancement and research productivity. Improving mentorship opportunities for junior faculty and trainees may increase pursuit of careers in areas such as adolescent health research and facilitate the development of new leaders in the field. Using a framework of Developmental Networks, a group of MCH Leadership Education in Adolescent Health training program faculty developed a pilot mentoring program offered at the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine Annual Meeting (2011-2013). The program matched ten interdisciplinary adolescent health fellows and junior faculty with senior mentors at other institutions with expertise in the mentee's content area of study in 2011. Participants were surveyed over 2 years. Respondents indicated they were "very satisfied" with their mentor match, and all agreed or strongly agreed that the mentoring process in the session was helpful, and that the mentoring relationships resulted in several ongoing collaborations and expanded their Developmental Networks. These results demonstrate that MCH programs can apply innovative strategies to disseminate the MCH Leadership Competencies to groups beyond MCH-funded training programs through programs at scientific meetings. Such innovations may enhance the structure of mentoring, further the development of new leaders in the field, and expand developmental networks to provide support for MCH professionals transitioning to leadership roles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,405,494
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#756
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,149
of 266,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.