You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
長野県安曇野市の水鳥に見られた眼球突出を伴うヒル寄生例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5686/jjzwm.21.141 |
| Authors |
Akiyoshi MOCHIZUKI, Tetsuya ITOH, Masashi AIDA, Kazuharu YAMAMOTO, Kiyoshi ASAKAWA, Nobuyuki OTA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,389,651
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,652
of 402,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them