| Title |
Management of atopic dermatitis using photo(chemo)therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Dermatological Research, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00403-008-0923-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thilo Gambichler |
| Abstract |
The conclusions that may be drawn by interpreting the current literature on the efficacy of photo(chemo)therapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited by several factors including publication bias, small sample sizes, high variability of parameters used in different studies, and in particular the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing different photo(chemo)therapeutic modalities. The newer ultraviolet (UV) modalities, such as medium-dose UVA1 and narrowband (NB) UVB, with a high output and a narrow emission spectrum may be considered the probably most efficacious regimens for treating acute and chronic AD, respectively, in particular when compared to conventional broadband UV regimens. There are no prospective trials on AD patients comparing NB UVB and UVA1 with more complex regimens such as heliotherapy, balneophototherapy, psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), and extracorporeal photophoresis. Support for the role of the aforementioned regimens in the treatment of AD is generally weaker than for the newer modalities including medium-dose UVA1 and NB UVB. When photo(chemo)therapy is considered for AD patients, its use is very much dedicated by the cost-effectiveness, availability, and the practicality of attending the clinic several times a week. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#331
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,250
of 170,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.