↓ Skip to main content

Is Computing an Experimental Science?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Technology, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Is Computing an Experimental Science?
Published in
Journal of Information Technology, June 1987
DOI 10.1057/jit.1987.12
Authors

Robin Milner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 11%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 22 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Researcher 8 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Technology
#64
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,396
of 12,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them