↓ Skip to main content

The nature and mechanism of superoxide production by the electron transport chain: Its relevance to aging

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
The nature and mechanism of superoxide production by the electron transport chain: Its relevance to aging
Published in
GeroScience, October 2000
DOI 10.1007/s11357-000-0022-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Muller

Abstract

Most biogerontologists agree that oxygen (and nitrogen) free radicals play a major role in the process of aging. The evidence strongly suggests that the electron transport chain, located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, is the major source of reactive oxygen species in animal cells. It has been reported that there exists an inverse correlation between the rate of superoxide/hydrogen peroxide production by mitochondria and the maximum longevity of mammalian species. However, no correlation or most frequently an inverse correlation exists between the amount of antioxidant enzymes and maximum longevity. Although overexpression of the antioxidant enzymes SOD1 and CAT (as well as SOD1 alone) have been successful at extending maximum lifespan in Drosophila, this has not been the case in mice. Several labs have overexpressed SOD1 and failed to see a positive effect on longevity. An explanation for this failure is that there is some level of superoxide damage that is not preventable by SOD, such as that initiated by the hydroperoxyl radical inside the lipid bilayer, and that accumulation of this damage is responsible for aging. I therefore suggest an alternative approach to testing the free radical theory of aging in mammals. Instead of trying to increase the amount of antioxidant enzymes, I suggest using molecular biology/transgenics to decrease the rate of superoxide production, which in the context of the free radical theory of aging would be expected to increase longevity. This paper aims to summarize what is known about the nature and mechanisms of superoxide production and what genes are involved in controlling the rate of superoxide production.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 168 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 21%
Chemistry 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#878
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,181
of 38,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them