↓ Skip to main content

Chickpea molecular breeding: New tools and concepts

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Chickpea molecular breeding: New tools and concepts
Published in
Euphytica, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10681-006-4261-4
Authors

Teresa Millan, Heather J. Clarke, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Hutokshi K. Buhariwalla, Pooran M. Gaur, Jagdish Kumar, Juan Gil, Guenter Kahl, Peter Winter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 64%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#324
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,088
of 154,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.